Coal Tar Analysis
Identification and Analysis of Coal Tars in Road Binder
All utilities arisings, except small and unplanned works, must be classified as hazardous unless proved to be non hazardous, and with the imminent withdrawal of RPS 211 that will expand to all arisings.
It is expensive to incorrectly classify waste as non hazardous if it is hazardous. Substantial fines and prosecution may be a consequence. Correctly classifying waste need not be expensive, however. It can be done on the spot, at low cost and be compliant. WM3 asks that “where possible” analysis should be done by a UKAS accredited laboratory, but restrictions of time and expense frequently mean that this is not possible. You can get accurate test results with the QED at low cost within minutes, saving time and costs and allowing more samples to be taken if necessary.
The main reason for tarmac/asphalt arisings being hazardous is the presence of coal tar in the road binder. However, not all road binder will contain coal tar, or if it does it may not be at a hazardous concentration.
Bituminous mixtures containing greater than 0.1% coal tar are hazardous (Code 17 03 01), but non hazardous (Code 17 03 02) if the coal tar content is less than 0.1% or the Benzo a Pyrene concentration of the coal tar portion is less than 0.005%. The QED gives you the percentage of coal tar present, plus the BaP content which is important for WM3 compliance.
PAK test spray is frequently used to test for coal tar but is unreliable and cannot be used in wet or cold conditions, making it unsafe to rely on.
Simple Road Tar Test
Chemical analysis is the only way to identify if coal tar is present in tarmac, but this is not time consuming, difficult or expensive when using the QED HC-1 analyser. We have refined the process to “shake, dip and read,” which takes about 20 seconds, involves no data entry (unless records are needed) and can be done by anyone, anywhere. The QED automatically generates a results page (below.)
Easy to Understand Results
The QED produces these results immediately, and provides all the information needed to correctly classify the road binder type. In the results sheet on the left, look at the final column. Any entry that mentions coal tar at above 0.1% is hazardous. So samples 2,4,5,7 and 8 are hazardous. The others are not. It’s a simple, reliable and effective method.
For Regulatory Purposes
The QED generates a fingerprint of the sample hydrocarbon and automatically compares it to a comprehensive library of reference material fingerprints.
Sample RP1 (row 1 in results sheet above) is from a bitumen based road binder and contains both raw bitumen and a typical bitumen based road binder.
Under WM3 this is Non Hazardous.
The QED has matched the fingerprint from sample H22 (row 4 in results sheet) to bitumen and
coal tar. The results show that 17% of the binder is coal tar with a BaP content of approximately 1.2%.
This material is Hazardous under WM3 guidance.
Sample 8 is from a 1950s vintage road binder, predominantly made from coal tar. The similarity between the red library fingerprint for coal tar and the black sample fingerprint is obvious.
Sample 10 shows the fingerprint of a modern, undegraded bitumen
based road binder.
This is Non Hazardous.
You can send samples to the QROS laboratory for testing, or hire a QED and do the analysis yourself. It’s very simple and each analysis takes just a few seconds, giving reliable results that are accepted by the Environment Agency as part of the data package.